Table of Contents
Introduction
When the new tax regime comprising capital gains tax was introduced four years ago, people were delighted to note that their tax liabilities had come down and that they no longer needed to lock up their funds in tax-saving instruments. But now not everyone shares this exuberance, though. Many investors are unhappy following the recent budget proposal for significant changes to the STCG and LTCG tax rates for various listed and unlisted assets implemented in India, effective July 23, 2024.
Understanding new CAPITAL GAINS TAX RATES
I have witnessed and been part of some lengthy discussions on the subject in various forums, social circles, etc. Participation in these discussions has been from all corners—those who have plans to buy/sell their properties and also those who have no such plans yet are academically inclined to learn or share opinions.
In the entire discussion, what emerged clearly is that there is confusion all around on the subject. Even some clarifications coming from the government were indicative of the fact that all the permutations/combinations were not considered while formulating the changes, and a lot is likely to depend on the interpretation of the advising community.
To ease out the apprehensions of existing property owners and to extend the benefits to everyone, the government later made a provision for taxpayers to choose the most beneficial option from the two, i.e., taxation at 20% after indexation or at 12.5% without indexation. Let’s first look at a detailed breakdown of the new tax rates and holding periods to know what has changed:
Listed Assets
- Stocks/Equity Mutual Funds: The STCG rate for stocks has increased from 15% to 20%. The holding period remains unchanged at 12 months for the short-term gains and more than 12 months for the long-term gains. The LTCG rate has also increased, from 10% to 12.50%.
- Listed Bonds: The STCG rate for listed bonds is now 20%, compared to the earlier slab rate. The holding period remains at 12 months, while the LTCG rate has increased from 10% to 12.50%.
- REITs/InVITs: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InVITs) now have a higher STCG tax rate of 20%, up from 15%. The holding period has been standardized to 12 months from 36 months for those investing 90% in equity ETFs. The LTCG tax rate has also increased from 10% to 12.50%.
- Debt and Non-Equity Mutual Funds: The tax rate for both STCG and LTCG for debt and non-equity mutual funds continues to be determined by the individual’s tax slab rate. The holding period criteria have been modified to 24 months, distinguishing between STCG and LTCG, which was previously the same.
- Equity Funds of Funds (FoFs):
- Equity FoFs will now face a 20% STCG rate; however, it was levied as per the individual’s slab rate earlier. The holding period has been adjusted at par with debt funds, and the LTCG rate is now 12.50%, up from the previous slab rate.
- Overseas Funds of Funds (FoFs): STCG for foreign FOF will continue to be applicable at slab rates, while the LTCG rate is now 12.50%, which was earlier at slab rates. The holding period has been reduced from 36 months to 24 months.
- Gold/Silver ETFs: The STCG rate for gold and silver ETFs is now 20%, changing from the slab rate earlier, while the LTCG rate has increased to 12.50%. The holding period has been brought down to 12 months from earlier 36 months.
- Gold Funds: The rate for gold funds will continue to be the same as the slab rate for STCG, while the LTCG rate is now 12.50% as against the slab rate earlier. The holding period for LTCG is now 24 months.
Unlisted Assets
- Real Estate (Physical): The rates for STCG remain based on the slab rate. The holding period is at 24 months with the LTCG rate reduced to 12.50% (without indexation) from earlier 20% (with indexation).
- Unlisted Debentures/Bonds: The rates for unlisted debentures/bonds will follow the slab rate for both STCG and LTCG. The holding period has been adjusted to 24 months from earlier 36 months.
- Physical Gold: The rate for physical gold continues to follow the slab rate for STCG, while the LTCG rate is now 12.50% (without indexation), down from 20% (with indexation) earlier. The holding period has been reduced from 36 months to 24 months.
- Unlisted Stocks: Tax rates for unlisted shares will remain the same as the slab rate for STCG. The holding period also remains 24 months. However, the LTCG has gone up from 10% to 12.5%
These changes apply to assets sold after July 23, 2024. The modifications in tax rates and holding periods aim to streamline the tax structure and bring uniformity across various asset classes.
Is everyone at a loss
While the changes or confusion surrounding the indexation benefits, etc. has created lots of discussion, the figures show that everyone is not at a loss. To begin with, the small investors having an income of up to Rs 2.25 lac per annum from long-term capital gains from listed equity/mutual funds pay the same amount as was being paid earlier, with tax-free gains increasing from earlier Rs. 1 lac to Rs. 1.25 lac. The increased tax on STCG will however pinch speculators. However, all is not lost, even in the fixed asset landscape. The calculation shows that there are instances where the benefits of the proposed system will be substantial. For others, the good news is that Section 54 benefits are still available.
Effect on Real Estate
There are a lot of rumours about the possibility of undervaluing the property prices by potential sellers to save tax or slow down in the real estate market by removing the indexation benefits. Since my posts are based on facts and figures, I generally stay away from extending opinions or making predictions, but to put to rest the above speculation, I must add that, in my opinion, this move of the government will not only increase property investment but also ensure the number of transactions going up. My prediction is based on two facts:
- Every investor would want to avail of Section 54 benefits for so long as they are available to the investor, and
- Rotating real estate will ensure markup of the purchase cost for the new property for determination of capital gains.
Need for a relook
Last but not least, buying a property for end use and handing it over to the next generations for use will have no problems, though, I feel the adage of wise people living in rented property (first half skipped intentionally) may appear more relevant in the longer term. The investors will need to go back to the basics of planning the requirements.
In light of these changes to the tax regime, the role of financial advisors has become increasingly crucial for investors navigating the new landscape. Remember that the option to choose between 20% tax with indexation and 12.5% tax without indexation is applicable on properties purchased before July 23, 2024 and any purchase after this date will essentially be taxed as per the new system of taxation.
Conclusion
The complexity and breadth of the adjustments, spanning various asset classes,R have introduced a level of intricacy that can be challenging to comprehend without expert guidance. Financial advisors can help investors strategize to minimize tax liabilities, optimize returns, and make informed decisions about asset allocation and timing of transactions. Consulting a financial advisor can provide clarity and confidence, ensuring that investment plans are both tax-efficient and aligned with long-term objectives in this evolving regulatory environment.
Read more blogs: tax-loss-harvesting-a-smart-tax-saving-strategy/
[…] Read More Blogs : NEW CAPITAL GAINS TAX RATES: FROM CONFUSION TO CLARITY […]
I’m extremely impressed along with your writing skills and also
with the structure for your weblog. Is this a paid topic or
did you customize it your self? Anyway keep up the excellent high quality writing,
it’s uncommon to peer a nice blog like this one these days.
Leonardo AI x Midjourney!
Thank you for your kind words. Appreciate it. The contents on this site are created in-house and are not paid weblogs.
The website design looks great—clean, user-friendly, and visually appealing! It definitely has the potential to attract more visitors. Maybe adding even more engaging content (like interactive posts, videos, or expert insights) could take it to the next level. Keep up the good work!
Thank you for your comments. It really means a lot to us. Appreciate it.
The new tax regime has sparked mixed reactions among investors, with some benefiting while others face challenges. Discussions are ongoing about the implications of the changes to STCG and LTCG tax rates. Many property owners are relieved by the government’s provision to choose between two tax options. However, concerns remain about how these changes will impact long-term investments. How will these tax adjustments shape the real estate market in the coming years?
The focus is expected to shift to affordable housing projects. The builders are expected to benefit from consistant demand from the end users.
The introduction of the new tax regime initially brought relief to many by reducing tax liabilities and freeing up funds from tax-saving instruments. However, recent changes to STCG and LTCG tax rates have caused concern among investors, especially with the new rates effective from July 23, 2024. Discussions on the topic have been widespread, involving property buyers, sellers, and those simply interested in the academic aspect. The government has provided options to alleviate concerns, allowing taxpayers to choose between taxation at 20% after indexation or 12.5% without indexation. How will these changes impact long-term investors in the fixed asset market?
The new tax regime has brought mixed reactions among investors, with some benefiting while others face increased liabilities. The recent budget proposal has sparked intense debates across various platforms, reflecting widespread concern. Despite the confusion, small investors with lower incomes seem to have retained their tax advantages. The option to choose between taxation methods offers some flexibility to taxpayers. What specific measures can the government take to further clarify and simplify these tax changes for the general public?
Simplification is already built into the system, and the present government is completely focused on small investors. Recent changes in the new tax regime are an example to understand the government’s approach. I feel, for initial years the tax rates should be kept below 10%, to more investment in the secotor. Also Government needs to have enhanced limits for affordable housing schemes.
The new tax regime has certainly stirred up a lot of debate, and it’s interesting to see how opinions vary so widely. While some investors are clearly unhappy with the changes, it’s worth noting that not everyone is at a loss, especially small investors who still enjoy tax-free gains up to Rs 1.25 lac. The provision to choose between 20% taxation with indexation or 12.5% without it seems like a thoughtful move to ease concerns, but I wonder how many people will actually benefit from this flexibility. The increased tax on STCG might deter speculators, but does it really address the core issues in the market? Also, with all the rumours about undervaluing property prices, how can the government ensure transparency and fairness in transactions? Overall, while the changes have their pros and cons, it feels like there’s still a lot of uncertainty and room for improvement. What’s your take on the long-term impact of these changes on the real estate and investment landscape?
There are great benefits for investors looking for a long-term investment landscape. There may be some readjustments required by the investors, who have been holding inventory for the short term to benefit from the sector-specific price movement.
The new tax regime has certainly stirred up a lot of debate, and it’s interesting to see how opinions vary so widely. While some investors are clearly unhappy with the changes, it’s worth noting that not everyone is at a loss, especially small investors who still enjoy tax-free gains up to Rs 1.25 lac. The provision to choose between taxation at 20% after indexation or 12.5% without indexation seems like a thoughtful move by the government to ease concerns. However, the increased tax on STCG does seem to target speculators, which might be a deterrent for some. The retention of Section 54 benefits is a silver lining for property owners, but the rumours about undervaluing property prices are concerning. Do you think these changes will ultimately benefit the majority of investors, or will they create more confusion and dissatisfaction in the long run?
I don’t think this will result in undervaluing the property, specially when section 54 benefits are available. There is going to be systematic spread of benefits across the investor class.
The new tax regime has certainly stirred up a lot of debate, and it’s interesting to see how it’s impacting different groups of investors. While some are relieved by the tax-free gains increase, others are clearly feeling the pinch, especially with the changes in STCG rates. The provision to choose between 20% after indexation or 12.5% without indexation seems like a thoughtful move, but I wonder how many taxpayers will actually benefit from this flexibility. The discussions around property undervaluation are particularly intriguing—could this lead to more transparency or just more confusion? It’s also worth noting that while small investors might not be heavily affected, the broader implications for the market could be significant. Do you think these changes will encourage more long-term investments, or will they push people towards alternative assets? I’d love to hear your thoughts on how this might reshape investment strategies moving forward.
It has always been a cherished dream for many to own a house for self and family and also leave it for the generations to come. This move, while it may appear to be not so investor-friendly in the short term, will certainly encourage the end users and long-term investors to buy their dream home. Since the benefits under Section 54 are available, the buyers will have no problem in upgrading their residential properties to better locations or bigger sizes. I expect the unsold inventory in the outskirts of major metros will have more buyers enquiry.
The new tax changes seem to have stirred up quite a debate among investors and property owners. While some are relieved about the unchanged rates for small investors, others are clearly unhappy with the increased STCG and LTCG rates. The provision to choose between taxation options is a smart move by the government to ease concerns, but it still leaves many confused. I wonder how these changes will play out in the long term—will they truly benefit the majority or just a select few? It’s interesting that speculators might bear the brunt of these changes, but what about the average investor? Do you think the government could have introduced these changes in a more phased manner to avoid such widespread apprehension? Lastly, how do you see these changes impacting the real estate market in the coming years? I’d love to hear your thoughts on whether these changes are a step forward or a setback for the economy.
ou’ve highlighted the exact dilemma many investors are facing. The government’s intent seems to be to encourage long-term investing while discouraging short-term speculation, which is why speculators feel the pinch more. For the average investor, the unchanged benefits and higher tax-free thresholds do offer some relief, though the complexity of multiple options has added confusion. A phased rollout might indeed have helped ease the transition. As for real estate, the impact will depend largely on how property valuations and compliance are enforced—if handled well, it could bring greater transparency to the sector. Whether this turns out to be a step forward or a setback will become clearer once the dust settles and we see how investors adapt to the changes.
The new tax regime has certainly stirred up a lot of debate, hasn’t it? While the initial excitement about reduced tax liabilities was palpable, the recent changes seem to have left many investors feeling uneasy. It’s interesting how the government has tried to balance things by offering options like taxation at 20% after indexation or 12.5% without it. However, the confusion around indexation benefits and the new rates has created quite a buzz. I can see why small investors might feel relieved with the increased tax-free gains, but the pinch on STCG for speculators is hard to ignore. The fact that Section 54 benefits are still available is a silver lining, though. Do you think these changes will ultimately benefit the majority, or will they create more challenges for investors in the long run? And what’s your take on the rumours about undervaluing property prices—could that become a loophole?
You’ve summed up the situation very well. The government seems to be walking a fine line between encouraging long-term investing and discouraging short-term speculation. The dual option of 20% with indexation or 12.5% without does add flexibility, but as you pointed out, it can also create confusion for many taxpayers. The increase in tax-free limits is a welcome step for small investors, though its actual impact may be limited. Section 54 continuing is indeed a positive. As for property undervaluation, that remains a grey area and will require stronger enforcement to avoid misuse. In the long run, much will depend on how consistently and transparently these changes are implemented.
The introduction of the new tax regime initially seemed like a relief, but the recent changes have left many investors concerned. It’s interesting how the government has tried to balance the benefits for small investors while increasing taxes on short-term gains. The provision to choose between 20% with indexation or 12.5% without it seems like a thoughtful move, but does it really simplify the process for taxpayers? I wonder if the increased tax-free limit for long-term gains will genuinely help small investors or if it’s just a minor adjustment. The rumors about undervaluing property prices are concerning—how can the government ensure transparency in such transactions? Overall, while some aspects of the new system seem beneficial, the confusion and mixed reactions suggest that more clarity is needed. What’s your take on these changes—do you think they’ll ultimately benefit the majority of taxpayers?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. You’ve raised some very valid points—especially around the trade-off between simplification and fairness for different categories of investors. The recent changes do provide some relief, but as you mentioned, clarity and transparency will be key to building investor confidence. Let’s see how the implementation shapes up in practice.